Jun 27

Beware of Stock Photo Entrapment and Extortion Scam

I was sent this email below by someone who wishes to be anonymous at this time. She informs me she is in the middle of a case and does not want to reveal her identity. While I have not yet been able to substantiate this stock photo extortion scam exists, it seems entirely plausible and worth protecting yourself against. For the record, I do not think Getty Images themselves would intentionally engage in this due to their high visibility and profile but I would not put it past unethical photographers to entrap website designers and website owners.

==========================

Found your website very useful.  I have noticed a new scam and am trying to share it so people are made aware.  (if you decide to share this, please don’t use my name as I am involved in an active case and until that is resolved I don’t want to be  included as the source of this info yet.  But once the cases is settled I do plan to provide actual details and evidence and will be happy to forward you the link.

See below:

Regarding your copyright infringement extortion, I have been noticing some new scams that I don’t think people realize yet.

What is happening is photographers and attorneys are teaming up and have found a way to make large amounts of money using the copyright infringement laws. Its pretty clever, they are intentionally providing their images in large format, to wallpaper and screensaver sites and other sites that offer public domain imagery and graphics then they wait for people to start using them on their websites, team up with an attorney and they go out and start asking for large amounts of money to settle.  The way you can tell, and should be suspicious is that most of those free download sites contain images that are 1600px wide or larger, in fact its a requirement in many cases and some of them require proof of copyright before accepting them in other words, they only accept submissions from the owner.  The only way for them to get images in those sizes is from the source, and most photographers NOT wanting their images stolen would never make those sizes available anywhere on the web.  Also their identifying marks are usually very small and in an area easily cropped out.

The other way you will know to be wary, is that most of those sites have DMCA information clearly posted, and offer to immediately remove any image that should not be there so if someone has an attorney and is going out and making people remove these images and asking them to pay, why would they not start with the source distributing these images.  And finally the DMCA is very strict and has a takedown policy, if these sites were in fact providing images that were protected, they would be taken down immediately. And anyone with an IP attorney knows how to do this and if their true intention is to help compensate clients fairly and is trying to actually stop people from stealing images, they would start with these sources.

So they send letters telling you to take the item down and to remit payment to avoid a law suit and its usually a very large amount.  They are clear to say that removing the image is not enough that the photographer deserves compensation and even if you didn’t know, you are responsible and they are unwilling to accept reasonable offers.

What people need to know to protect themselves:

  • First, make sure the people claiming infringement are the true owners and make them provide the copyright information. In some cases its a scam and in some cases they dont’ even have a copyright.  It is true that even if they don’t have a valid copyright they have some protection still,  but their copyright status will make a big difference on how much they can ask for.
  • The other thing, is they need to make sure to check out the photographers website, and see if they have terms of use, clearly marked and protected images, copyright notices on every page, etc. Although it is not required, it can give you a better case for innocent infringement.
  • The other reason why is because this can be further proof that the photographer is intentionally making it easy for people to take his images. He WANTS you to take his image because he WANTS you to pay because he isn’t making enough now legitamately.
  • And most important of ALL, If you can prove you either weren’t the one who actually did it, for instance it was your webmaster OR if you can show that the image you downloaded is from one of those 3rd party sites (should be easy to show by the size and name of the image) then you are what is called an “innocent infringer” which means your infringment was NOT willful because you did not know the images was protected.  The new law reduces fines to innoncent infringers to only $200.

These lawyers and photographer teams will be very insistent that you are a thief no matter if you knew or not, will not be reasonable and are not looking for a fair compensation based on how the image was used, where it was used, size, traffic to the site, how long it was up, etc.  The only way to deal with this situation is to get a lawyer and fight it or offer $200 as an innocent infringer and point out all the facts and hope they realize they aren’t dealing with an easy mark.  IF they wont take it, get a lawyer because most likely you will win in court and not have to pay a dime. Oh and if you point out all these facts they will try to defend that you are still guilty if taking images from a peer to peer site and that nothing is free and you took a risk by taking an image from the web so you are to blame, BUT not all of these sites are Peer to Peer and and many of them clearly mark on their site that the images are for public use.

Its important to note that the law says no matter what, if you use someones image on your site whether you knew or not, as the owner of the site you are responsible so simply ignoring it is not good.  So the best thing to do is never use an image you don’t know.  But what you are trying to show here is that your were not a willful infringer and to protect from people using these laws to extort money from you, especially when the law is still not that great in this area, as many people do not know IP law and are not aware they are doing anything wrong and this law is giving dishonest people a way to make money and as most people know, when it comes to money people are always looking for ways to make it legal or not and will find loopholes and abuse it.  This is one of those cases, and the fact that not many people know  yet its important to get the word out so the law has time to catch up and people wont be able to pull this crap.  Oh and they are also targeting small sites and blogs who don’t have lawyers and easily scare into paying.

Jun 08

Second Certified Letter to Patty Wimmer of QP Distribution

After doing more research in my QP Distribution file of statements, invoices, agreement, and price sheets, I sent this Certified Mail and First Class Mail. The Certified Mail was ignored and unsigned. It was also my response to her weak attempt to settle with me. She is an Office Manager in title only. She acts like an inexperienced housewife with no business experience. Being nice had no effect whatsoever. You may want to refer to my First Certified Letter to Patty Wimmer of QP Distribution which was also ignored and unsigned.

======

April 25, 2011

Patty Wimmer
c/o QP Distribution
PO Box 70
Mulvane, KS 67110

Ms. Wimmer:

I am writing this letter as a response to your email sent to me Thursday, April 22, 2011 AND to notify you in writing that I have discovered further irregularities in my preliminary audit of prior invoices and statements going back several years.

You should know I am not trying to “convince” you or otherwise “change your mind”. That is a pointless endeavor. However, for the purposes of documenting my grievances against you and QP Distribution, you are being notified in writing what I have discovered since my last Certified Letter.

Specifically, you underhandedly penalize customers that choose to bypass shipments through your UPS account.  You want customers to ship through UPS because it is an account that you can mark up and treat as a profit center. Unfortunately, you imply through your written agreement and business practices that the handling fees you quote and charge are the only fees you receive for the service. That is simply NOT true. You conveniently “bury” the additional handling fees by quietly marking up the UPS shipment fees.

Further, your invoices make no distinctions or itemizations of related charges. As such, you do not like it when customers ask to have their shipments routed through their own shipping accounts. As a penalty, you conveniently call it a “third-party shipping fee”. I call it a “penalty shipment fee” because shipping to FedEx or a customer’s account is just as simple as your own. I know because I have shipped through both UPS and FedEx using my own accounts and other people’s accounts.

All of this only came out when last year when I asked you some very pointed questions about your UPS shipment service, compared my FedEx shipping fees with what you charged, and I found them dramatically different.

To further my claim, the invoices that I receive from you do NOT have proper itemization. You conveniently invoice lump sums with minimal descriptions.  For any outsider looking at your invoices, it is nearly impossible to calculate how handling fees and shipping fees are charged.

For the last few years, I have been ignorant in that I did not audit your invoices and account more carefully. I have mostly paid without questioning when I should have been watching more closely. Quite frankly, I was way too trusting of you and QPD. However, you should know that my prior ignorance is not in any way, shape, or form, an agreement to any additional undisclosed fees you slipped in and I have paid in. In reality, any undocumented charges that I did not sign or agree to, you are potentially liable for.

I told you in my last letter that I was no longer begging or pleading for your cooperation for a peaceful resolution. I will no longer be extorted by your withholding of book inventory. You have by your own decisions and actions destroyed my trust in you and QPD and created this conflict.

It is clear to me you are in breach of your agreement by attempting to extort payment from charges that I never agreed to and certainly not notified in writing. More upsetting to me is that you got away with it for so long.

Hopes for a peaceful resolution were destroyed last week when you forced me to take a strong position over your extortion attempt to withhold my books, charge additional undocumented fees, and demand payment upfront. The easiest way to NOT be extorted anymore by you is to give up the book inventory, terminate storage services, and to dissolve the business relationship.

Regarding your last email to me, I found what you wrote both insulting and laughable at the same time.  How petty are you to ask me to mail you FedEx labels and call FedEx to pick up the books?  Never have I asked any of my customers for such a thing even when I shipped on their behalf on their accounts. Don’t do me any favors here. No book shipments are required from you anymore.

Regarding “crediting” the $6.50 late fee? How big of you considering that I never signed or agreed to and I was never informed of it in writing to begin with. It was YOUR wonderful management and customer relation skills to “teach me a lesson” and enforce that bogus $6.50 late fee which finally caused me to terminate this account to begin with.

Regarding the so-called agreement you emailed, I refuse to sign it. Anything I agreed to sign was done back in 2003 and will remain that way.

As I told you in my last letter, your withholding my books has little meaning to me anymore. Your wonderful business negotiation skills saw to that. You can do what you want with the book inventory. You have been ordered to stop storage services and the shipping of any books. So, this talk of a “final shipment” and the FedEx labels is now a moot point and one less thing you have to “worry” about.

As stated in the last Certified Letter, you already received my 30-day notice of account termination. That means storage services are no longer wanted. That also means if you choose to store them past April, you do so at your own choice.  You do not have permission to store the books anymore.  You can discard the book inventory in the dumpster or as you see fit as I do not agree to your outrageous and ridiculous “recycling fee”.

As far as I am concerned, my account is paid off, my balance at zero, your storage and shipping services terminated, and you have been granted written permission to discard the books into the dumpster. As far as I am concerned, this matter is now effectively closed.

Respectfully,

Matthew Chan
Ascend Beyond Publishing

=======

The follow-up to this Second Certified Letter continues on the blog post: My BBB Complaint Against QP Distribution.

Jun 08

First Certified Letter to Patty Wimmer of QP Distribution

This is the text of the first Certified Letter I sent to Patty Wimmer of QP Distribution. The Certified Mail was ignored and unsigned. However, I was smart enough to also send another copy with First Class Mail. After I sent this letter out, I did more research of prior statements, invoices, agreement, and price sheets, in my files regarding QP Distribution.

=====

April 15, 2011

Patty Wimmer
c/o QP Distribution
PO Box 70
Mulvane, KS 67110

Ms. Wimmer:

I regret I have to write this letter but we have hit a standstill on the final closing of my account. Our email exchanges have given me very little indication that you are willing to be reasonable and that you continue to take a dictatorial position of forcing policies and fees upon me that I never agreed to.

I told you repeatedly I wanted to settle my account peacefully and not get caught with more unexpected fees and policies.  You have taken advantage of my goodwill by vindictively adding and padding fees that I never received written notifications on or ever agreed to. Additionally, you have, at the last hour, changed payment terms to “pay in advance” despite the fact my account is both current and at zero balance.

For most of the 8 years of our business relationship, it has been smooth up until very recently. Specifically, there were 2 incidents.

One was back in March 2010, I asked for a way to reduce my monthly storage fees by phone and by email.  I did not receive a timely reply from you until after you billed my account the higher storage fee and then only after I followed up with you with a phone call.

You ultimately discarded some of the inventory to reduce it to $25/month.  Of course, I had to pay a marked-up disposal fee for that privilege.  It was only after I said that I felt it was unfair and going to publicize this incident that you reluctantly adjusted my account the following month because you said David would disapprove otherwise.

And then last month, without any written notice or warning, you charged my account a $6.50 late fee. I told you I objected to how you never warned me or provided any written notification of any late fee or made even one single attempt to call or email me regarding my account if it was such a problem. In any case, I paid my account current.  I asked for a removal of this late fee given that the account was paid up. In the spirit of cooperation, I even agreed to a late fee for any FUTURE late payments.  You said you would look into this. Ultimately, you told me I deserved the late fee despite the fact you were too lazy to ever email or call me once because you were “too busy” and I had always paid up my account.

I then said if you wanted that $6.50 so badly, it was time to terminate our business relationship.  I was not going to be continually held hostage to the fact you have my book inventory.  I was also not going to be subject to any more arbitrary changes in fees or policies despite my prior complaints about sudden fee or policy changes without any written notification. With the exception of one written notice I received in 2007, this has been habitual and I believe you railroad your customers into it because most don’t want their books held hostage. And you won’t acknowledge that it is bad and improper business to make changes without written notice. In the 8 years I have worked with QPD, there have made almost no effort to changes to this way of operating.

When I decided to terminate my account, you asked for a written 30-day notice.  Again, I complied. I sent that 30-day notice through email and you accepted it both by email and verbally on the phone. Since that notice, we have spoken on the phone more than once on how to resolve things peacefully because it was my intention to settle my account in full. During that time, I asked if there was any more “fine print”.  You said no.  There would only be the final shipment order (if I wanted one) and a disposal fee. I said that was ok as long as I knew and agreed to the charges.

Previously, I asked for an estimate of the disposal fee and only after I followed up again by email did you finally reply. The number you gave me is inconsistent with the 12-cents per pound you quoted me. As a reminder, none of my paperwork indicates this fee that you are trying to force me to pay. Even with a nominal handling fee, the numbers do not add up correctly.  I informed you about the discrepancy and you have conveniently ignored that.

Also, because I instructed you to bill shipping costs to my Fedex account, you are now charging me a “3rd party billing” fee, another unwritten fee and without advance notification.

It has been nearly 2 weeks since we last spoke and just as I gave instructions today to go ahead with the final book shipment (which was originally submitted to you 2 weeks ago), you now tell me everything has to be paid in advance and in full. Your explanation is that it is QPD’s closing policy.  Well, I don’t see it in any of my paperwork and my account is current and in good standing. You certainly did not tell me of this when I specifically asked 2 weeks ago concerning any more “fine print”.

You are now trying to collect fees on services not yet incurred while holding my book inventory. I find this unacceptable.  You are in the storage business and there are rules governing the storage business.  I am quite confident you are in violation of many of those rules.

Even after all of this craziness, I even made good-faith effort to offer a partial advance payment.  Well as of this letter, which has been sent via Certified Mail, I am no longer begging for your cooperation. You have mistaken my continued requests for a peaceful resolution and final book shipment as my weakness.  If you want to hold my book inventory hostage, that is your choice.

Because we have come to a reasonable agreement despite my best intentions and efforts, this is how I see the situation.

•    You received my written 30-day notice last month.  April 2011’s storage fees have been paid. As such, my account is complete current and paid up. As far as I am concerned that is the last storage fee.

•    You have chosen to withhold and hold hostage 12 cases of books I asked you to ship (using my Fedex Ground Account). Need I remind you that the books are still technically my property and that you are supposed to go through a formal sale, repossession, or auction process?  You were given a written request to ship those books on the terms previously agreed to.

•    I showed goodwill in my willingness to pay for the disposal fee but I will no longer pay for padded or unannounced fees. I have not been given a proper and complete accounting breakdown of the discrepancy beyond the 12-cents per pound. You have conveniently ignored this request. In fact, the agreement I in 2003 signed says it was 5-cents per pound, not 12-cents.

•    I have asked more than once asked to find a way to peacefully resolve this and thus far, it has been “your way or the highway”. Enough is enough.

It is regrettable that this situation has come to pass but I refuse to work with any business that continues to unprofessionally and unilaterally make policy or fee changes without any written notification. It is bad business.  And in most legal circles, it is quite inappropriate and the policies unenforceable.

Even though you hold my remaining book inventory, I refuse to be held hostage by QPD any longer. I will not be extorted to make full payment in advance for services not yet rendered and of charges that cannot be substantiated or properly accounted for. Since you refuse to be reasonable, I am not spending any more time on this situation. I have chosen to close this matter out.

Since my account is now current, and we have not come to any final agreements, the book inventory is now yours to deal with.

Respectfully,

Matthew Chan
Ascend Beyond Publishing

Jun 08

My BBB Complaint Against QP Distribution

Below is the text of the letter I sent to the BBB of Kansas against QP Distribution, (Patty Wimmer, Office Manager, and David Schaefer, Owner).

=====

June 10, 2011

Mac Carter, President/CEO
Better Business Bureau of Kansas
345 N. Riverview St., Suite 720
Wichita, KS 67203

Mr. Carter:

I am writing to you and your office to file a written complaint against QP Distribution, a book warehousing business I have been dealing with since 2003. I thought it was a good working relationship until last year when problems began to appear. I am only writing this as a last resort. I have done what I reasonably can with limited success. They have chosen a “my way or the highway” approach.

My copies of the Certified Letters I sent them tells most of the story and the relevant facts but I will once again recount my complaints against them down below.

I have enclosed copies of my recent Certified Letters to QP Distribution which they have conveniently ignored. Fortunately, I did send secondary copies via First-class U.S. Mail. I have also enclosed copies of the only 2 prices sheets and updates I ever got from them. I have also attached samples of invoices and statements I received showing how they operate.

I noticed that QP Distribution over the years began to unilaterally change their pricing policies with little or no written notice. I have received only two written notices in 2004 and 2007. However, the only agreement I signed was from 2003 and the last complete price sheet I last received was from 2004. In 2009, I began to scrutinize my invoices and statements more closely.

In Spring 2010, I contacted Patty Wimmer with my concerns over their increased storage fees and how they determine storage pricing. I also questioned her about their so-called UPS shipping fees which seemed out of line from my own pricing experience with UPS. They are supposedly a higher-volume shipper serving many book publishers and authors throughout the U.S. whereas I am a small and occasional shipper. And yet their shipping charges seemed substantially higher than mine.  I later learned that their UPS shipping fees is a “profit center” in addition to their storage fees and ever-increasing handling fees for “touching and moving” the books.

In an effort to reduce storage fees, I worked out an agreement with Patty to “dispose” of my excess inventory by a combination of shipping some excess inventory to me and the rest to simply “dump” into the dumpster.  I was charged for the privilege of reducing my inventory with an inflated disposal fee. I believe it was $7.75 per title plus 12 cents per pound.  I only agreed to it because I neglected to go back to my original price sheet which specifies that it is actually $7.75 per title and 5 cents per pound.

Additionally, this ordeal was complicated by the fact that because of her delays in following up, my account was penalized with the higher storage fee. I asked her why I should be penalized when it took her over 2 weeks to follow up. Even then, I had to remind her. By then, the new billing period hit and I was charged the higher fee. She said the owner, David Schaefer did not allow adjustments of accounts even though this was her error. I was upset with this explanation and threatened to report them to the BBB.

In any case, she eventually did make it right by allegedly doing without David Schaefer’s knowledge by reducing the following month’s fee. I considered the issue to be resolved at that time. I was not interested in getting into this further to contest any more charges as I felt going forward there would be few problems. Looking back, I was naïve and should have asked for a detailed pricing breakdown which they did NOT provide in the individual invoice or monthly statements.

Earlier this year, QP Distribution decided to charge me a “late fee” of $6.50. In past months because the monthly amount was relatively small ($25.00/month), I simply paid it every other month. Admittedly, I was careless and I didn’t pay them until it was 90 days behind. The crux of the issue that I brought up is that there is no written provision anywhere of any late fees in the agreement I signed or on any invoice or statement.

Further, Patty Wimmer made no efforts to either call or email me if collections was such a large issue despite the fact that I was in semi-regular contact with her and almost always paid my account in full when I did pay. I felt a simple phone call or an email is very reasonable. And to charge a late fee without any written or verbal notice is unconventional and inappropriate. Despite my efforts to apologize and stay current going forward, Patty claimed that the owner David Schaefer was in charge of such decisions.

Ultimately, she claimed that the late fee would stand. Initially, she blamed it on the owner, David Schaefer but ultimately she said she felt I should be charged the $6.50 late fee.  I then decided that I was no longer going to be held at mercy to their arbitrary policy and fee changes. It was the straw that broke the camel’s back. I gave 30-days written notice as they had requested. I paid my account in full.

I gave advance instructions to send a portion of my remaining book inventory to me with over 2 weeks notice. I specifically asked her if there were any remaining issues. She said no.  When it came time to ship the books, I was then informed I now had to make the final payment in advance before books could be shipped out to me despite the fact I had given her my Federal Express account where they wouldn’t even have to pay for shipping. Additionally, despite several emails asking for detail accounting of the so-called $451.00 disposal fee and other handling/shipping fees. She only partially explained them.

She said they would impose a “third-party” shipping fee since I chose to bypass their hugely marked up UPS Shipping fees. It was clear to me they were no longer trustworthy. Despite my best efforts to politely get ahead of potential problems, they kept introducing new obstacles by bringing up a new “policy” or a revised fee. They have deviated from our initial agreements and using the book inventory they hold as leverage.

I clearly realized they were using my own book inventory against me. I also realized they were using the long-distance from their warehouse against me. They knew I was unhappy and wanted to terminate the business relationship.  And they were determined to use every means they could to extract extra payments from me to the point of ridiculousness.  After 8 years of being on 30-day terms, on the final month, everything is flipped. They refuse to accurately assess their fees as it relates to the agreements I initially signed and they outright say they are going to hold the book inventory despite the fact my account was current.

I finally decided I would not be held hostage by my final book inventory request and simply cancelled that. I wrote them that they could dispose of the books any way they wanted. If they wanted to sell it off and receive monies, that was fine.  But because I refuse to pay their arbitrary and inflated disposal fee, they now say my account is NOT closed and they have continued to bill my account.

To summarize:

  • I have been a good customer for 8 years and I signed only one agreement and received two written updates. I did not agree to anything else and certainly not any new fees or policies they seem to dream up from time to time.
  • I was proactive in trying to peacefully close down the account. But I have been met with the “my way or the highway” attitude. It was only after I became much more assertive and insistent that they even bothered acknowledging my complaints.
  • I sent two costly Certified Mails to document my efforts to communicate my issues with them and that I made a concerted, reasonable effort resolve this matter.  They chose to ignore both Certified Mails. I have received no written correspondence except from two short emails with a passing reference to two issues.
  • Patty Wimmer claims to have no say in pricing or company policy.  She apparently isn’t even responsible for her lack of ability to email or phone someone with problems. And apparently she isn’t responsible for her own slow turnaround for follow-up issues time either. And yet, there are supposedly only 3 employees.  Her, Brian, and David Schaefer. I now find interacting with Patty Wimmer to be pointless as she is irresponsible, unempowered, and untrustworthy.  She dismisses the 2003 agreement we signed, and continually points to owner, David Schaefer, as being the responsible party. And yet, she has never offered to have David speak with me.
  • Although I threatened to escalate this to the BBB and publicize their actions on the Internet, I have not done so until now. They appear insistent in extorting me with my own book inventory. I have received two more invoices/statements claiming I owe the money when I was clear the relationship was terminated and the issues resolved on my end. Essentially, I have surmised they are going to continue to bill me until the fees are substantial enough to initiate legal action. At $25/month, it will be in 2012 where it becomes a meaningful amount to collect. However, I am not going to let them do this without reporting their actions and documenting my case against them.
  • As evidenced by this letter, I am not ignoring this situation.  In fact, I now have to escalate this matter to the BBB since they want to send me illegitimate invoices. I have tried to work with them, I have brought up the signed agreement, I have sent them written notice of the issues I have a problem with, and still they put their head in the sand.
  • I have never seen any publishing-related business operate like they do. They run it in such a backwards manner making up rules as they go. For a business that has been around for so long, they don’t even have a basic functional website. They only have a placeholder website. http://www.qpdistribution.com.  Unlike them, my websites are functional and I will be openly sharing my dispute with QP Distribution as a real-life case study of what kind of extortionistic tricks unethical book warehousing businesses use.

I understand the BBB has limited abilities to resolve this for me. But I am openly writing and reporting this now that QP Distribution and Patty Wimmer have forced my hand. It is quite unfortunate that after 8 years of doing business, it has to come to this. I informed Patty Wimmer that I was going to escalate the matter by reporting them to the BBB. She did not seem to care. Either she views the BBB as inconsequential or she did not believe I would escalate and publicize this matter.

In conclusion, what I would like the BBB to assist me with is to have them close my account as was instructed months ago. Any charges since termination need to be reversed or voided as they are invalid. Regarding the remaining inventory, they can either resell the inventory for cash for the disposal fee they claim I will owe or they can take it to the dumpster. This is a reasonable request since I was at a zero balance during which I told them their storage services was no longer welcome.

If QP Distribution chooses not to cooperate even with the BBB’s help, please record my letter and all the supporting documents as a formal written complaint against them. The BBB may also release said complaint documentation to any or all interested parties. The BBB may also release my contact information to anyone seeking a “reference” on QP Distribution. They can also expect that my complaint packet will be submitted to the Federal Trade Commission and the Kansas Attorney General’s office as a warning to others about QP Distribution’s extortionistic business practices.

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Respectfully,

Matthew Chan, Publisher

=====

You can also read my First Certified Letter and Second Certified Letter to QP Distribution.

You can read the series of follow-up communications between myself, David Schaefer of QP Distribution, and the BBB is chronicled in the blog post: QP Distribution Responds to my Complaint to the BBB of Kansas Plains

 

Jun 08

QP Distribution: Desperate Book Warehouse Storage Extortion Tactics

I really did my best to keep this situation low key and hoped it might either go away or work itself out. Unfortunately, that was simply wishful thinking. QP Distribution, owned by David Schaefer, and staffed by Patty Wimmer is a small book warehousing / storage company I used to store most of my offset printed books from 2003. It was mostly a good relationship until two years ago when I started noticing some irregularities in what Patty was telling me regarding their handling and shipping fee changes. They started nit-picking and making subtle policy changes that I perceived as trying to squeeze more money out of their existing customers. This was happening just as print-on-demand was rising. I surmised that Lightning Source and CreateSpace was putting a squeeze on anyone in the off-set printing business which includes book warehousing and book storage businesses.

In Spring 2010 was my first real conflict with QP Distribution specifically with Patty Wimmer when I was penalized with a higher storage fee when 2 weeks earlier I asked about how I could lower it. She only followed up after my reminder. By then, I got charged another month’s fee. She pushed it off on the owner, David Schaefer, and how she cannot change the storage fee after it has been charged despite the fact it was HER mistake. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. It worked out after I paid for the privilege of lowering my inventory. * sarcasm* I threatened to report them to the BBB and report them publicly for their poor customer service.

In Spring 2011, QP Distribution decides they want to teach me a lesson by imposing a $6.50 late fee on my account despite my 8 years of great payment history. Apparently, my account was so “problematic” (despite the fact that I generally pay in full every 60 days or so) that they could charge me an unannounced late fee but NOT even once email me or call me to see what happened with my account. Also, keep in mind, there is no mention of late fees anywhere in the agreement, invoices, or statements. It was something Patty and David dreamed up apparently. But Patty first says David wants to do to this to my account but she later confesses and tells me she agreed with it also.

I finally decided I had enough of their foolishness. I am tired of Patty sounding like the powerless housewife when she is supposed to be the Office Manager.  And portraying David as this unbending dictator. (He might be but I have not dealt with him enough to make an opinion. I only know what Patty tells me. One thing seems certain, she seems fearful of David. I wonder how he will react when he realizes all the discussion that is happening without him around.) Anyhow, I also discovered there is a hidden profit center to their service. They charge a handling fee per book and per case but they don’t tell anyone about the hugely marked up UPS shipping fee. I only found out because I asked very pointedly if what they charge us is what they pay.  The answer was and is still “no”. Their UPS shipping fees are just as high if I walked in to a UPS store paying full retail price. Not good for any publisher that wants to stay in business for long.

QP Distribution doesn’t like it if you give them your account number for shipping. If you do, they will make sure you pay anyway with a “third-party shipping fee”. They also have a “recycling fee” which is actually a disposal fee to dump any inventory you might not want. I call it a dumpster fee and they are trying to charge $7.95 plus 12 cents per pound. The problem I have with this is 2-fold. It works out to be this outrageous fee for throwing your inventory into the dump AND my agreement actually says $7.50 plus 5 cents per pound, not the 12 cents per pound they are trying to push. And you know what they will do if you don’t pay their disposal fee? They will continue to charge you storage fees.

And if you decide to show up at their doorstep to pick up your inventory? You will get charged a handling fee. If you tell them to just dump it and don’t pay their inflated dumpster fee, they won’t and they will simply reinstate the storage fee. Doesn’t that just sound like a business relationship you want to get into?

The trick for these types of businesses is it costs ZERO to get your book inventory inside their doors. But they will use every trick fee they can impose to get them out. Whether it is 1 book, 1 case, or a pallet, you will absolutely pay.

In any case, I finally had to file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau of Kansas. I am not going to have them hold me hostage with their tricks. Stay away from book warehousing and storage services. Go print on demand to avoid book warehousing and storage altogether. Or if you must have storage, go rent from your local storage facility. But definitely stay away from QP Distribution and its ilk.

And to show how outdated they are, go look at their pathetic placeholder website. It is the same pathetic placeholder website they have had for years. Can you imagine being a reputable business an NOT having a website? Well, go look at QPDistribution.com.

=======

I have escalated this matter by filing a written complaint with the BBB against QP Distribution.

You can also read my first Certified Letter and second Certified Letter to QP Distribution.

May 11

TurnKey Publishing – Episode 9

Matthew Chan & Tony Centavo discuss the rise of ebooks and how it might be used by future generations.

May 11

TurnKey Publishing – Episode 8

Matthew Chan & Tony Centavo discuss how with today’s technology and software, you can create a portable recording studio at any location.

May 11

TurnKey Publishing – Episode 7

Matthew Chan & Tony Centavo introduce and discuss the benefits of audio publishing.

May 03

TurnKey Publishing – Episode 6

Matthew Chan & Tony Centavo discuss the differences between writers vs. publishers, writers looking for positive affirmations, and dying before your book is published.

May 03

TurnKey Publishing – Episode 5

Matthew Chan & Tony Centavo discuss self-publishing blogger’s (Michael Marcus) extensive and scathing book review of “TurnKey Publishing”.

http://bookmakingblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/this-book-is-inaccurate-inadequate-and.html

Page 2 of 712345...Last »